Bluefish pricing, plans and limits

Enterprise platform that monitors a brand across major AI models, plans fixes and measures results. Quote-only pricing, SOC 2 Type II listed.

  • ai search visibility
  • Web

Last updated: 2026-10-19

Bluefish is an enterprise AI marketing platform, launched in 2024, that monitors how answer engines such as ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity and Claude describe a brand. It generates page-level tactics, checks AI claims against a verified source of truth, and measures each change against a fixed baseline. The company reports that about 10% of the Fortune 500 use it.

About Bluefish

Bluefish is a New York software company, founded in 2024 by Alex Sherman, Jing Feng and Andrei Dunca, that sells an enterprise platform for managing how AI answer engines describe a brand. It announced a $43 million Series B on 14 April 2026, co-led by Threshold Ventures and NEA, which the company says brought total funding to $68 million. Named customers include Adidas, American Express, Hearst, LVMH and Ulta Beauty.

The platform is sold as three suites. AI Monitoring repeats a fixed set of prompts every day and reports visibility, sentiment, influence and the sources behind each answer across answers from ChatGPT through Google's Gemini, plus Perplexity results, Anthropic's Claude replies and the shopping assistants of Amazon. AI Optimization turns the gaps into page-level tactics through Agentic Campaigns, assigns each one to a team, and can push verified brand facts to AI platforms, and to AI agents over MCP, the Model Context Protocol. AI Measurement compares each change with a fixed baseline so a gain is not credited to a model update. AI Accuracy, added in 2026, checks what the engines say against a brand's own verified facts. Because several of the engines belong to OpenAI, Anthropic and Google, a brand's standing can shift whenever one of them changes a model, which is the problem the baseline is built for.

What separates it from self-serve trackers is the enterprise scaffolding: breakdowns by customer audience, security badges for procurement, and a services arm that the vendor says most customers use. The closest like-for-like rival, Profound, also sells by sales call to large brands. Budget-minded teams get printed monthly prices from Peec AI and from OtterlyAI, while an SEO-first team may prefer the AI visibility plan inside Semrush. Publishing verified sources to the engines is a job that Senso (see its record) takes on from the content side.

Nothing is priced publicly. The site's only call to action is a demo request, there is no pricing page, and no free plan or trial is listed on the pages read. A single cost estimate exists, in a study Bluefish paid for; the pricing notes cover it. Other records in the same HokAI category include the SEO suite Ahrefs, plus CiteLens for a free plan, and Writesonic for AI writing; the wider tracker list shows the rest. To look at the answer engines themselves, see Best AI Search Engines in 2026, or read how CiteLens compares with Palmata.

Pricing

No public price. com/pricing returned a 404 on 2026-10-19 and every call to action reads Request a demo, so the platform and its services are custom quotes. 9 million in its three-year model.

That is a modelled total, not a list price, and Forrester advises readers to substitute their own estimates. Printed prices sit with Peec AI, and also with OtterlyAI. On the quote-led side, Profound remains the closest rival.

com and its blog on 2026-10-19, in USD.

Plans and pricing
TierMonthly priceWhat it includes
PlatformCustom quoteAI Monitoring Suite: daily tracking, audiences, sentiment, citation analysis, AI Accuracy, AI Optimization Suite: Agentic Campaigns, data syndication, Bluefish Agents over MCP, AI Measurement Suite: Collections, trend analysis, attribution against a fixed baseline, SOC 2 Type II, SSO, MFA and API or MCP access listed on the product page
ServicesCustom quoteOne-time performance diagnostic, Custom AI brand audit, Custom AEO execution plans, Custom configurations and AI provider support

Key Features

  • Daily multi-engine monitoring: Repeats a fixed prompt set every day across 10+ models, including Alexa for Shopping, and splits visibility and share of voice by the customer personas a brand defines.
  • Citation and influence analysis: Impact Score, Influence Rank and Citation Analysis trace each AI answer to the URL behind it, so a team sees which owned and third-party pages carry the most weight.
  • AI Accuracy and Brand Vault: Extracts each factual claim an engine makes about the brand, checks it against a verified source of truth built from the brand's own content, and traces every mismatch to its channel and response; launched 5 May 2026.
  • Agentic Campaigns: Takes a goal such as visibility or accuracy, then generates page-specific tactics from AI response data, citation data and site content and assigns them to owners; launched 18 June 2026.
  • Baseline measurement: Starts every KPI from a fixed-prompt baseline built from Google signals, brand data and panel data, so a lift can be separated from a model update and tied to a dated tactic.
  • MCP and data syndication: Pushes verified brand data to AI platforms and serves it to AI agents through native MCP integrations; the product page also lists API access.
  • Strategy services: Offers a one-time performance diagnostic, a custom AI brand audit and AEO execution plans; the vendor says 85% of customers use the services arm.

Pros

  • Tracking, tactics and measurement sit in one workspace, so a gap found in monitoring can become an assigned tactic and later be judged against a baseline without exporting data.
  • SOC 2 Type II, SSO and MFA are listed on the product page, which gives a regulated buyer a starting point for security review.
  • Publishes a Forrester economic model with a stated range of 220% to 446% ROI, and repeats Forrester's caveat that readers should substitute their own figures.
  • Fixed-prompt baselines address the usual weakness of answer-engine reporting, where results move because the models moved and not because the team did anything.

Cons

  • No public pricing, free plan or self-serve sign-up was found, so a team cannot size a budget or test the product before a sales conversation.
  • Positioned for global brands, so a small team or single-site business may find it priced and scoped beyond its needs.
  • Independent proof is thin: the ROI model was commissioned by Bluefish, and no public peer-review rating for the product was found.
  • The security badges rest on the vendor's page alone; no public trust-center page was found, so ask for the SOC 2 report before relying on it.

Data Handling

Compliance
SOC 2 Type II · SSO · MFA and HIPAA-Ready as worded on the vendor product page; API and MCP access listed

Frequently Asked Questions

What are Bluefish's pricing plans in 2026?

Bluefish publishes no plans. Access starts with a demo request, and the site shows no pricing page and no self-serve checkout, so any price is a custom quote for the platform, its services or both. The only cost number found is in a Forrester study that Bluefish commissioned, which put total costs at $2.9 million in a three-year model of a 20-brand composite company. Read that as a modelled total, not a list price.

Are the Bluefish reviews on G2 about this product?

No. The G2 page titled Bluefish, read for this record, belongs to an open-source text editor, and its reviews describe building web pages. Searches of G2, Capterra and Trustpilot turned up no public rating for the AI platform, so this record shows none rather than borrowing the editor's score. Ask the vendor for customer references instead.

What should you use instead of Bluefish?

[Profound](/hub/tools/profound) suits enterprise teams that want a similar sales-led platform with agent and crawler tooling. For printed monthly prices start with [OtterlyAI](/hub/tools/otterlyai), then compare [Peec AI](/hub/tools/peec-ai). [Semrush](/hub/tools/semrush) fits teams that want AI visibility inside an SEO suite they already pay for. Choose Bluefish over these when accuracy checks against a verified fact base and hands-on strategy support are the priority.

What separates Bluefish from Profound?

Both sell to large brands through a sales call, and Profound's only public brand plan is a one-week trial. Profound lists SOC 2 Type II, up to nine tracked engines and crawler analytics, while Bluefish stresses audience breakdowns, AI Accuracy against brand-verified facts and a services arm. Pick Bluefish if wrong claims about your products are the pain, and run the same prompt set in both demos before deciding.

What does it take to start using Bluefish?

Request a demo at bluefishai.com, since no self-serve sign-up is listed; the login at platform.bluefishai.com is for existing customers. Expect to supply your brand, products, competitors and target audiences, because the platform is configured around them, plus first-party content if you want AI Accuracy checks. The vendor quotes an average of 30 days to a first measurable result for customers using its services.

Top Alternatives

  • Profound: Pick Bluefish if wrong brand claims and cross-team campaign tracking are the problem; pick Profound if crawler analytics and a longer public feature list decide it.
  • Peec AI: Pick Peec AI when printed monthly prices and a start without a demo matter; pick Bluefish if you need accuracy checks and a services arm.
  • OtterlyAI: Pick OtterlyAI if a small team wants printed plans and an API; pick Bluefish if the buyer is a global brand with several teams to coordinate.
  • Semrush: Pick Semrush if AI visibility should live inside an SEO suite you already pay for; pick Bluefish if AI answers are the main job and you need campaign tracking.

More AI Tools on HokAI

Visit Bluefish Official Website