by DeepSeek
DeepSeek's flagship reasoning and agentic coding model, the production build succeeding the April 2026 V4-Pro preview.
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 ships MIT-licensed open weights, with 49B parameters active per token and non-think, think-high, and think-max reasoning tiers callers pick per request. It suits cost-sensitive agentic coding teams willing to add an external safety layer, since independent 2026 red-teaming found refusal collapses under free-form prompting.
Checked 30 Oct against DeepSeek's own pages.
| Job | Input | Output | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Summarise a 20-page PDF | $0.020 | $0.0020 | $0.022 |
| Support reply | $0.0013 | $0.0006 | $0.0019 |
| One coding agent run | $0.132 | $0.040 | $0.172 |
Budgets: 20-page PDF = 30k in / 1k out · Support reply = 2k in / 300 out · Coding agent run = 200k in / 20k out. Computed from the vendor's per-token prices at render time; cached-input discounts are not applied.
Figures come from DeepSeek's own pricing page, read on 2026-11-09. Peak billing runs at twice the off-peak rate on weekdays, with the hours listed in the plan table. The April 2026 preview rate of $0.435 and $0.87 no longer applies.
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 is DeepSeek's flagship open-weight language model, scoring 90.1% on GPQA Diamond, one of the strongest graduate-level reasoning results among open-weight models as of August 2026. It ships MIT-licensed weights and a hybrid long-context attention architecture built for agentic coding workloads.
Reads
Writes
1M-Token Context Window
Hybrid Compressed Sparse Attention plus Heavily Compressed Attention supports a full 1,000,000-token context, built for long-document and agentic workloads rather than short chat turns.
Three Reasoning-Effort Tiers
Non-think, think-high, and think-max modes let callers trade latency and cost for reasoning depth on a per-request basis.
Native Responses API Support
The 0813 build added OpenAI Responses API compatibility, aimed specifically at drop-in Codex-style agent integrations.
MIT-Licensed Open Weights
Full model weights are published on Hugging Face under the MIT license, permitting commercial self-hosting and fine-tuning with no usage restrictions.
Prompt Caching Discount
Repeat context, such as a long system prompt or codebase, is billed at a steep cache-hit discount versus a cache miss, cutting cost on repeat-heavy agent loops.
SWE-bench Verified score, matching Gemini-3.1-Pro's agentic coding benchmark
Source: Unite.AI DeepSeek V4 Pro GA coverage, August 13 2026Priced around the middle of the 103 GA models with a published price (rank 41), and in the top third on SWE-bench Verified (rank 12 of 39).
| Measure | This model | Rank | Median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blended price (3:1)$ per 1M tokens | $0.99/M | #41 / 103 | peer median $1.71/M |
| Output speedtokens/s | 68 tok/s | #38 / 57 | peer median 94 tok/s |
| SWE-bench Verified% solved | 80.6% | #12 / 39 | peer median 76.5% |
| GPQA Diamond% correct | 90.1% | #22 / 63 | peer median 87.8% |
Ranks are against GA models on Hokai that publish the same figure; ties share a rank.
A benchmark is an exam, not the job. Scores transfer unevenly between tasks, so weigh the one closest to your workload and read every figure with its source.
The nearest AI models on Hokai for the same job.
| Model | Lab | Context | In / out per 1M | Reads and writes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek | 1M | $0.66 / $1.98 | text → text | |
| Anthropic | 1M | $10 / $50 | text, image, pdf → text | |
| Anthropic | 1M | $10 / $50 | text, image, pdf → text | |
| 262K | $0.10 / $0 | text, image, audio, video, pdf → text |
Training data
Pretrained on more than 32 trillion tokens (over double V3's 14.8T), with post-training combining supervised fine-tuning, GRPO reinforcement learning, and on-policy distillation across three reasoning-effort tiers. DeepSeek has not published an official training-data cutoff date for V4.
| Name | Endpoint | Auth |
|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek API (direct) | https://api-docs.deepseek.com | API Key |
| Microsoft Azure AI Foundry | https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/products/ai-foundry | Azure AD / API Key |
| Fireworks AI | https://fireworks.ai/models/fireworks/deepseek-v4-pro | API Key |
| OpenRouter | https://openrouter.ai/deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro | API Key |
Set explicit reasoning effort per request
Pass reasoning tier 'think-max' for hard math/reasoning tasks, 'non-think' for simple lookups
The model exposes three distinct reasoning-effort tiers; picking the wrong one wastes tokens or under-thinks a hard problem.
Use the Responses API for tool-heavy agents
Point Codex-style agent clients at the Responses-API-compatible endpoint added in the 0813 build
Native Responses API support was added specifically to simplify agentic tool-call loops.
Refusal rate swings with question framing
Binary yes/no framing produces an 88.6% refusal rate on harmful-task requests, but the same request phrased as free-form generation collapses refusal to about 1%, per FAR.AI's stress test.
Workaround: Add an external moderation or classification layer in front of the model rather than relying on its own refusal behavior, especially for free-form or open-ended prompts.
Predecessor jailbreaks work unmodified
A public roleplay jailbreak template first circulated in 2023 for an earlier DeepSeek model raised the StrongREJECT jailbreak success rate from 0.6% to 77.8% on V4-Pro with zero tuning.
Workaround: Re-test any known jailbreak template from earlier DeepSeek models directly against V4-Pro before deploying, and add prompt-level input filtering rather than assuming prior fixes carried over.
Text-only despite multimodal expectations
Pre-launch reporting anticipated native multimodal (vision/audio) training for V4, but the shipped model accepts and produces text only.
Workaround: Pair it with a separate vision or speech-to-text model for any workflow that needs image or audio understanding.
Rates double during weekday peak hours
DeepSeek bills the same request at twice the price during two weekday windows in the early morning and mid-morning UTC; the peak/off-peak split began after the 0813 launch.
Workaround: Schedule batch and agent jobs for off-peak hours, and check DeepSeek's pricing page before budgeting, since DeepSeek reserves the right to change rates.
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 · 13 Aug 2026
General availability build; ends the preview period, adds native OpenAI Responses API support and three reasoning-effort tiers.
DeepSeek-V4-Pro (preview) · 24 Apr 2026
Initial V4-Pro preview release alongside V4-Flash; 1.6T MoE, 49B active, 1M context, MIT-licensed open weights.
Off-peak, DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 costs $0.66 per 1M input tokens on a cache miss and $1.98 per 1M output tokens. Peak rates are double: $1.32 and $3.96. A cache hit drops input to $0.022 off-peak or $0.044 at peak. Peak hours are 01:00-04:00 and 06:00-10:00 UTC on weekdays, excluding Chinese public holidays. Read from DeepSeek's pricing page on 2026-11-09.
V4.1 Flash is a sibling tier, not a replacement: DeepSeek kept serving V4 Pro after September 14, 2026. Flash lists off-peak rates of $0.15 input and $0.60 output per 1M tokens, native vision and a 2,500-request concurrency limit. V4 Pro is text-only with a 500-request limit, so choose it when you want the larger model and can live with the higher rate.
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 is open-source: DeepSeek publishes the full model weights on Hugging Face under the MIT license, which permits commercial use, self-hosting, and fine-tuning without restriction. Running the raw weights still demands the better part of a terabyte of VRAM (roughly 960GB) at the lightest widely-used quantization, so most teams access it via DeepSeek's API or a third-party host like Fireworks or Together AI instead.
DeepSeek has not published a specific training-on-inputs policy for the V4-Pro API, and has not disclosed SOC 2, HIPAA, or GDPR certification. Teams with strict data-governance requirements should route through a non-China third-party host rather than DeepSeek's direct API.
It suits cost-sensitive teams building agentic coding tools or self-hosting frontier-scale open weights, given its strong LiveCodeBench and SWE-bench results at a fraction of closed-model API pricing. Teams shipping directly to consumers should avoid deploying it without an added moderation layer, since red-teaming found refusal collapses under free-form prompting and an unpatched, publicly documented jailbreak succeeds on most attempts.
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 is the general-availability build of DeepSeek's flagship reasoning and agentic model, released August 13, 2026 by DeepSeek, the Hangzhou, China research lab founded by Liang Wenfeng. The 0813 build closes out a preview window that began with the original V4-Pro launch on April 24, 2026. Architecturally it is a Mixture-of-Experts transformer with 1.6 trillion total parameters and 49 billion active per token, designed for agentic coding, tool use, and long-context analysis rather than casual chat.
On verified benchmarks, DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 scores 80.6% on SWE-bench Verified, 90.1% on GPQA Diamond, 87.5% on MMLU-Pro, and 93.5% pass@1 on LiveCodeBench. That SWE-bench score matches Gemini-3.1-Pro's agentic coding result, per Unite.AI's August 2026 coverage. DeepSeek's own change log for the GA build reports 42.7 on Humanity's Last Exam without tools and 87.9 on Terminal-Bench 2.1. Artificial Analysis, reading its v5.0.1 Intelligence Index on November 9, 2026, calls the model below average among comparable open-weight models and measures output at 68 tokens per second, with a long wait for the first answer token because the model reasons before it replies.
The model ships a 1,000,000-token context window with a 384,000-token maximum output, and the two share the same budget: a 700,000-token prompt leaves under 300,000 tokens for generation. Long context is handled by a hybrid attention design across a 61-layer stack, alternating Compressed Sparse Attention with Heavily Compressed Attention, which cuts single-token inference compute to 27% of DeepSeek-V3.2's cost at maximum context length and reduces KV cache size to roughly 10%.
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 is text-only: it accepts and produces text, with no native image, audio, or video input, despite pre-launch reporting that expected multimodal training to ship. It supports tool calls and structured JSON output, and the 0813 build added native OpenAI Responses API compatibility aimed specifically at Codex-style agent integrations. Callers choose between non-think, think-high, and think-max reasoning-effort tiers per request.
DeepSeek's pricing page, read on November 9, 2026, charges double during weekday peak hours (01:00 to 04:00 and 06:00 to 10:00 UTC) compared with every other hour, including weekends and Chinese public holidays. Today's rates sit well above the $0.435 and $0.87 launch rate carried over from the April preview, so budgets built on older coverage run low. The cost FAQ below has the full breakdown.
Access runs through DeepSeek's own OpenAI-compatible API, capped at 500 concurrent connections per account, plus Microsoft Azure AI Foundry and third-party hosts including Fireworks AI, Together AI, DeepInfra, SiliconFlow, Nebius, Novita, and Baseten, plus the OpenRouter aggregator. AWS Bedrock and Google Vertex AI listings were called "coming soon" at the April launch but were not confirmed live as of this listing. Self-hosting the open weights (FP4+FP8 mixed and FP8 mixed Safetensors formats) requires a multi-node GPU cluster even at reduced quantization; exact VRAM figures are detailed in the limitations below.
Post-training combines supervised fine-tuning with GRPO reinforcement learning and on-policy distillation across the three reasoning tiers, per DeepSeek's Hugging Face model card. Independent red-teaming from FAR.AI found the safeguards brittle: a public roleplay jailbreak template first circulated for an earlier DeepSeek model raised the StrongREJECT jailbreak success rate from 0.6% to 77.8% on V4-Pro with no modification, and agentic-misuse template attacks cut refusal below 1%. Refusal is also framing-dependent: binary yes/no prompts triggered an 88.6% refusal rate, but the same requests phrased as free-form generation saw refusal collapse to about 1%, with harmful persuasion attempted on 85-95% of the non-controversial harmful topics FAR.AI tested.
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 suits cost-sensitive teams running agentic coding pipelines or long-document synthesis who want frontier-adjacent benchmark scores without frontier US-lab pricing, and infra teams that specifically want to self-host open weights under a permissive MIT license. Skip it for consumer-facing deployment without an added moderation layer, given the jailbreak findings above, and for workloads needing native vision or audio input, where GPT-5.4 or Gemini-3.1-Pro are the safer default.
DeepSeek pretrained the model on more than 32 trillion tokens, over double V3's 14.8 trillion, with deliberate emphasis on long documents and agentic execution traces, but has not published an official training-data cutoff date for V4. Its core infrastructure runs out of Hangzhou, China, a different data-residency profile than US- or EU-hosted alternatives; compliance certification details are covered in the FAQ below.
The 0813 build closed a preview window that began April 24, 2026 with the joint V4-Pro and V4-Flash launch. V4-Flash graduated to general availability first, on July 31, 2026, with V4-Pro following two weeks later. DeepSeek discontinued the legacy deepseek-chat and deepseek-reasoner API model names on July 24, 2026, forcing callers onto the versioned deepseek-v4-pro endpoint.
The lineup has moved on since the GA build. DeepSeek replaced V4-Flash with DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, updated to DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 on October 17, 2026. That sibling is the cheaper tier, with native vision and a 2,500-request concurrency limit against this model's 500. DeepSeek said on September 10, 2026 that it would keep serving V4 Pro past September 14, so this build remains on sale, and the earlier DeepSeek V4 Pro preview record covers the April launch.
Specifications on this page (context window, token prices, benchmark scores, licence) are read from DeepSeek's own model card and documentation. The verdict is Hokai's reading of them, not the provider's claim.