Best suited for cost-sensitive agentic coding and long-document workloads that need a huge context window without frontier-model pricing. It scores 90.6 on Terminal-Bench 2.1 and outputs at roughly 218.7 tokens per second, replacing DeepSeek's own V4-Pro as the vendor's recommended default in September 2026.
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash is a multimodal AI model that scores 40 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, roughly double the median for similarly sized open-weight models. Built on a new Causal Encoder-Decoder Mixture-of-Experts architecture, it natively processes text and images across a 1M-token context window, positioned by DeepSeek as the replacement for its V4-Pro flagship.
Where it sits
- $0.262/M$ per 1M tokensBlended price (3:1)Lower is better#11 / 60peer median $1.86/Mvendor price, checked by HokAI
- 219 tok/stokens/sOutput speedHigher is better#10 / 34peer median 91 tok/scited: Artificial Analysis
- --% solvedSWE-bench VerifiedHigher is better-- / 26peer median 78.3%per source, see benchmark scores
- 90.9%% correctGPQA DiamondHigher is better#14 / 43peer median 87.8%per source, see benchmark scores
Cheaper than 83% of the 60 GA models with a published price, and in the top third on GPQA Diamond (rank 14 of 43).
Ranks are against GA models on HokAI that publish the same figure; ties share a rank.
Provider: DeepSeek · Family: DeepSeek V4
Context window: 1,048,576 tokens · Max output: 384,000
Input modalities: text, image, tool-calls · Output: text, tool-calls
About DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash was built by DeepSeek, the Hangzhou-based AI lab founded by Liang Wenfeng in 2023, and released in September 2026. It replaces DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 (July 2026) as the smallest model in a new architecture family: a Causal Encoder-Decoder (CED) design that splits inference into a causal encoder stage and a decoder stage, on a 552-billion-parameter Mixture-of-Experts backbone with 1 shared expert plus 384 routed experts per layer, 6 activated per token. The asymmetric design activates 8B parameters on input and 16B on output, cutting KV-cache memory sharply versus its predecessor. DeepSeek positions it to replace V4-Pro entirely, saying testing put it ahead on performance, cost, speed and completion time; V4-Pro is being phased out. On the vendor's instruct, max-reasoning-effort figures, V4.1-Flash scores 90.9 on GPQA Diamond and 90.6 on Terminal-Bench 2.1, up from the July predecessor's 82.7. DeepSeek's own DeepSWE v1.1 coding eval rose from 54.4 to 74.2, with a 3,471 Codeforces rating and 63.9 on Humanity's Last Exam (with tools). Artificial Analysis puts its Intelligence Index at 40, roughly double the 18 median for similarly sized open-weight models, with output speed of 218.7 tokens/second and a blended price of $0.18 per 1M tokens. The base, pre-instruct checkpoint separately reports 74.1 MMLU-Pro and 79.4 HumanEval. The model ships a 1,048,576-token context window (max output 384,000 tokens); no independent long-context recall benchmark had been published for this release at launch. Input is text and images: a purpose-built DeepSeek-ViT vision encoder converts images into embeddings processed jointly with text from the start of pretraining. Output is text only, with no native audio or video. The API is OpenAI-compatible with function calling (tools/tool_choice) and a JSON response_format mode with no schema enforcement, requiring the word JSON in the prompt. Reasoning uses a continuous reasoning_effort value from 1 to 100, not a fixed enum; low/high/max aliases map to 50/75/100, and thinking defaults on at effort 50 if unset. DeepSeek prices V4.1-Flash (API name deepseek-flash) on a peak/off-peak schedule, with rates doubling during two short UTC windows on weekdays; see pricing for exact per-token rates. Legacy names deepseek-v4-flash and deepseek-v4-flash-vision-exp now route to V4.1-Flash at the same rate. Also available via Azure AI Foundry, Vertex AI, AWS Bedrock, Fireworks AI and OpenRouter. Weights are on Hugging Face under the MIT license; the native FP4+FP8 checkpoint needs an estimated 170-175GB of VRAM, versus roughly 90-100GB with community INT4 quantization at some cost to accuracy. DeepSeek has not published a system card or training-data cutoff date for V4.1-Flash. Independent testing of the DeepSeek line finds it answers most topics freely but refuses or deflects questions on China-sensitive subjects, including Tiananmen Square, Taiwan's political status and Xinjiang; one tracker found paired prompts scoring as more censored rose from 79% to 88% between the July preview and production release. DeepSeek's Open Platform Terms of Service state no specific training or retention policy for API data; its consumer-app privacy policy allows an opt-out and says personal data is processed and stored in mainland China. The mix of a 1M-token context window, sub-$0.20 blended pricing and a sharp coding/agentic benchmark jump suits cost-sensitive agentic coding, long-document processing and high-volume workloads where MIT-licensed weights matter for self-hosting or fine-tuning. A missing audio/video modality, no independently verified frontier benchmark suite, and no formal compliance documentation are the main reasons a regulated or voice-first team would pick GPT-5 or Claude-class models instead.
Pricing
Off-peak (all hours outside the windows below): $0.15 per 1M input tokens (cache miss), $0.003 per 1M (cache hit), $0.60 per 1M output. Peak hours (01:00-04:00 and 06:00-10:00 UTC, Mon-Fri) double every rate to $0.30 / $0.006 / $1.20. No free API tier; DeepSeek's consumer chat app is free separately from the API.
What a real job costs
| Job | Input | Output | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Summarise a 20-page PDF | $0.0045 | $0.0006 | $0.0051 |
| Support reply | $0.0003 | $0.0002 | $0.0005 |
| One coding agent run | $0.030 | $0.012 | $0.042 |
Budgets: 20-page PDF = 30k in / 1k out · Support reply = 2k in / 300 out · Coding agent run = 200k in / 20k out. Computed from the vendor's per-token prices at render time; cached-input discounts are not applied.
Key Features
- Causal Encoder-Decoder Architecture: Runs a dedicated encoder stage ahead of the decoder stage, activating only a small fraction of the full Mixture-of-Experts backbone on each token instead of running every expert.
- 1,048,576-Token Context Window: Supports over 1 million tokens of context, with a documented API output cap of 384,000 tokens.
- Native Vision Encoder: A purpose-built DeepSeek-ViT vision encoder feeds image embeddings into the model jointly with text, rather than as a bolted-on adapter.
- Continuous Reasoning Effort Control: Accepts any integer reasoning_effort from 1 to 100, with API aliases low/high/max mapping to 50/75/100, letting callers trade latency for accuracy in fine steps.
- Peak/Off-Peak API Pricing: Bills less during most of the week and doubles the rate during two short daily UTC windows on weekdays; see pricing for the exact per-token rates.
Pros
- Posts a 3,471 Codeforces rating and sizable gains on DeepSeek's own coding and reasoning evals versus its July 2026 predecessor.
- MIT-licensed weights on Hugging Face allow free commercial self-hosting and fine-tuning, unusual among models with frontier-adjacent coding scores.
- A context window far larger than most competitors and off-peak API pricing among the cheapest available for a vision-capable model at this benchmark tier.
Cons
- No published SWE-bench Verified, AIME 2025, ARC-AGI-2 or LMArena score for this release, making direct frontier comparisons hard.
- Text and image input only; no native audio or video modality.
- No public system card or training-data cutoff date, and independent audits find it refuses or deflects a large share of China-sensitive political questions.
Benchmarks
- MMLU-Pro: 74.1% vendor-reported · 13 Sep 2026 — A harder version of the 57-subject knowledge exam, % correct.
- HumanEval: 79.4% vendor-reported · 13 Sep 2026 — Small programs that must pass hidden tests, % passing.
- GPQA Diamond: 90.9% vendor-reported · 13 Sep 2026 — PhD-level science questions that are hard to search for, % correct.
- Terminal-Bench 2.1: 90.6% vendor-reported · 13 Sep 2026 — Multi-step tasks completed in a real command line, % solved.
- Humanity's Last Exam: 63.9% vendor-reported · 13 Sep 2026 — Expert-written questions across many fields, % correct.
- AA Intelligence Index: 40 cited: Artificial Analysis · 13 Sep 2026 — Composite of 10 evaluations run by Artificial Analysis, 0 to 100.
- AA blended price: $0.18/M cited: Artificial Analysis · 13 Sep 2026 — Price per 1M tokens at a 3:1 input to output blend, as listed by Artificial Analysis.
- Output speed: 219 tok/s cited: Artificial Analysis · 13 Sep 2026 — Median tokens written per second as measured by Artificial Analysis.
A benchmark is an exam, not the job. Scores transfer unevenly between tasks, so weigh the one closest to your workload and read every figure with its source.
Frequently Asked Questions
What does DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash cost to run via the API?
DeepSeek prices the API model deepseek-flash at $0.15 per 1M input tokens and $0.60 per 1M output tokens off-peak, with a cache-hit input rate of just $0.003 per 1M. Every rate doubles during two UTC peak windows each weekday, roughly 01:00 to 04:00 and 06:00 to 10:00. There is no free API tier, though DeepSeek's consumer chat app remains free to use separately.
How does DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash compare on benchmarks to DeepSeek-V4-Pro?
DeepSeek has not published matching benchmark scores for V4-Pro on several of V4.1-Flash's headline evals, including its 63.9 result on Humanity's Last Exam with tool access, so a full side-by-side is not possible. What the vendor does state is that its own testing found V4.1-Flash equal or ahead of V4-Pro on every metric it checked, which is why V4-Pro is being retired rather than kept alongside it.
What license governs DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash weights?
MIT. DeepSeek publishes the full model weights on Hugging Face under the MIT license, which permits commercial use, self-hosting and fine-tuning without a separate license from DeepSeek. Both vLLM and SGLang added day-one support for serving the model architecture, and DeepSeek notes community quantization can reduce the VRAM needed at some cost to accuracy.
Does DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash train on user data?
DeepSeek's Open Platform Terms of Service do not state a specific training or retention policy for API inputs and outputs. Its general privacy policy covers the consumer chat app, where users can opt out of having conversations used to improve its models, and states personal data is processed and stored in the People's Republic of China.
Who should pick DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash, and who should look elsewhere?
It fits teams building high-volume agentic coding pipelines or processing very long documents who want MIT-licensed weights and a huge context window without frontier-model pricing. A voice or video product, or a regulated-industry buyer that needs formal compliance paperwork and a published frontier benchmark suite, is better served by GPT-5 or Claude-class models today.
Top Alternatives
- DeepSeek-V4-Pro: Pick V4.1-Flash over V4-Pro for nearly every workload; DeepSeek itself is phasing V4-Pro out in favor of it.
- Grok 4 Fast: Pick DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash if you need MIT-licensed weights to self-host; pick Grok 4 Fast to stay inside xAI's own ecosystem and tooling.
- GPT-5: Pick GPT-5 when you need a published SWE-bench Verified and LMArena score for a frontier-grade comparison; pick DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash when budget and self-hosting matter more.
- Mistral Medium 3: Pick Mistral Medium 3 for an EU-based vendor with clearer compliance documentation; pick DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash for the larger context window and lower blended price.