by Sakana AI

Fugu review, pricing and limits

One API that hires a team of AI models to plan, execute, and verify your task.

  • general
  • coding
  • research
checked

Fugu suits engineering and research teams who want frontier-level output without locking into one model vendor: it assigns whichever specialist model fits a step and checks shaky answers before returning a result. It supports a 272K-token context window before higher rates kick in. It is not a fit if you need to know exactly which model touched a given request.

Fugu is Sakana AI's fully autonomous multi-agent orchestrator, launched June 2026. A trained conductor model assigns each task to specialist agents from its pool, then verifies the result before returning one synthesized answer. Fugu Ultra reaches 95.5% on GPQA Diamond, Sakana's highest published reasoning score for the system.

Maker: Sakana AI · Autonomy: fully autonomous · Maturity: GA

Underlying models: Sakana Conductor (proprietary orchestrator, trained via reinforcement learning), Pool of closed and open partner models (not fully disclosed by Sakana AI)

About Fugu

Fugu is Sakana AI's multi-agent orchestration system, delivered as a single OpenAI-compatible API endpoint rather than one monolithic model. Instead of answering every prompt itself, Fugu is a trained conductor model that decides which specialist models to call from an agent pool, whether to split a task into planning and execution steps, when to have another agent verify the result, and how to synthesize the final answer. Sakana AI, the Tokyo-based lab behind it (founded 2023), built Fugu on two internal research frameworks: TRINITY, which explores evolutionary coordination across Thinker, Worker, and Verifier roles, and Conductor, which uses reinforcement learning to discover collaboration strategies between agents rather than hand-wiring them. The lab raised a $135M Series B in November 2025 at roughly a $2.65B valuation, led by Mitsubishi UFJ, Lux Capital, and In-Q-Tel, funding its shift from research demos toward production systems like Fugu.

Fugu ships in two tiers. The base model is tuned for low latency and interactive use, acting as a default engine for chat and coding assistants. Fugu Ultra trades speed for quality, drawing on a larger pool of expert agents for complex, high-stakes work such as automated ML research, cybersecurity analysis, and multi-step patent investigation. What makes this an agent rather than a chatbot is that the orchestration is learned end-to-end: Fugu can recursively call itself and other agents without a human approving each intermediate step, deciding on its own when to delegate, when to verify, and when a first answer is shaky enough to warrant a second opinion.

On benchmarks, Fugu Ultra scores 73.7% on SWE-bench Pro, 93.2% on LiveCodeBench v6, 95.5% on GPQA Diamond, 50.0% on Humanity's Last Exam, and 82.1% on TerminalBench 2.1, according to Sakana's June 2026 release materials. Sakana positions these scores as ahead of Claude Opus 4.8 (69.2% SWE-bench Pro), GPT-5.5 (58.6%), and Gemini 3.1 Pro (54.2%) on the same task, and roughly matching Anthropic's Fable 5 and Mythos Preview despite Fugu not being a single frontier-scale model itself. These figures are Sakana-reported and have not been independently reproduced on public leaderboards.

Fugu launched publicly on June 22, 2026, priced as a subscription with a separate metered API (see pricing for exact figures). The API matches the OpenAI Chat Completions format, so teams can swap an existing endpoint URL and get orchestrated multi-agent behavior without rearchitecting their application. Standard-tier users can opt out of specific underlying providers; the Ultra tier uses a fixed agent pool with no opt-out. Sakana frames Fugu's core pitch as reduced single-vendor lock-in: by routing across multiple providers behind one endpoint, teams get insulated from any single vendor's outages, export-control changes, or policy shifts. An open-source alternative called Maestro solves the same orchestration problem from the opposite direction, self-hosted and fully transparent, versus Fugu's closed and centrally trained approach.

Pricing

Three subscription tiers at $20, $100, and $200 per month. Standalone API bills per token at roughly $5 per 1M input tokens and $30 per 1M output tokens, with higher rates above 272K tokens of context. No confirmed free tier as of the June 22, 2026 launch.

Key Features

  • Learned Orchestration: A trained conductor model decides which specialist agents handle a task and how to combine their outputs, instead of a hand-coded routing script.
  • Recursive Self-Calling: Fugu can call itself and other agents repeatedly for test-time scaling on hard problems, without retraining or a human approving each step.
  • Two-Tier Model Line: Base Fugu targets low-latency interactive use; Fugu Ultra draws on a larger expert-agent pool for high-stakes tasks like ML research and cybersecurity analysis.
  • OpenAI-Compatible Endpoint: One API endpoint matches the OpenAI Chat Completions format, so existing GPT, Gemini, or Claude integrations can switch over with minimal code changes.
  • Built-In Verification Step: A shaky answer can be routed to a second agent for review before Fugu returns a final result, instead of always returning the first agent's output.

Strengths

  • Sakana reports Fugu Ultra leading named single-model competitors on its own coding and reasoning benchmark comparison, not just matching them.
  • The OpenAI-compatible API lets teams already built on GPT, Gemini, or Claude endpoints adopt orchestration by swapping a URL rather than rewriting integration code.
  • Routing across multiple underlying providers behind one endpoint reduces exposure to any single vendor's outages or policy changes, by design.

Weaknesses

  • Not available in the EU or EEA as of the June 2026 launch, while Sakana completes GDPR compliance work.
  • Sakana has not comprehensively disclosed which models sit in Fugu's agent pool, making it hard to audit exactly what is processing a given request.
  • Output tokens cost more per million than several single-model frontier APIs, and a complex orchestrated task can burn through more output tokens than a single-model call would.

Frequently Asked Questions

How much does Fugu cost in 2026?

Fugu costs $20, $100, or $200 per month depending on subscription tier, per Sakana's June 2026 launch pricing. A separate API bills per token: about $5 per 1 million input tokens and $30 per 1 million output tokens, with higher rates once a request's context passes 272,000 tokens. Because a complex task can route through several specialist agents, per-task API cost is less predictable than a flat single-model rate.

Is Fugu free to use?

No. As of its June 2026 launch, Fugu has no confirmed free tier: access is either a paid monthly subscription or a metered API, with no trial mentioned in Sakana's launch materials. Anyone wanting to evaluate it has to commit to the lowest subscription tier or pay per token through the API.

What should you use instead of Fugu?

Claude Code fits best if you want a single-vendor coding agent that runs directly in your terminal or IDE. OpenClaw suits teams that want a transparent, self-directed agent they run and control themselves rather than a managed service. Maestro is an open-source project solving the same multi-model routing problem as Fugu, but self-hosted and fully visible about which models it calls. Teams that just need one frontier model rather than an orchestrator might pick Claude Opus 4.8 or GPT-5.5 directly instead.

Is Fugu better than Claude Code?

Claude Code is a single-model coding agent that runs directly in a terminal or IDE, while Fugu is a trained orchestrator that routes each task across a pool of specialist models from multiple vendors. Sakana reports Fugu Ultra scoring above Claude on its own coding-benchmark comparison, though Claude Code's single-vendor design means simpler pricing and no dependency on which model Fugu happens to route a request through. Choose Claude Code for a self-contained coding workflow tied to one vendor; choose Fugu when you need one endpoint that also covers research or security-analysis tasks beyond coding.

What does it take to start using Fugu?

Sign up for one of the subscription tiers through Sakana AI's site, or request API access to integrate Fugu into an existing application. Because the endpoint matches the OpenAI Chat Completions format, teams already calling GPT, Gemini, or Claude endpoints can typically switch by changing the URL and API key instead of rewriting request logic. Start with a small, well-scoped task first to see how Fugu plans and routes work before trusting it with a multi-step, high-stakes job.

Top Alternatives

  • Claude Code: Pick Claude Code for a coding agent that stays inside one vendor's terminal or IDE; pick Fugu to route the same kind of work across multiple providers for a broader mix of coding, research, and analysis.
  • OpenClaw: Pick OpenClaw for a transparent, self-directed agent you run and control yourself; pick Fugu for a managed orchestrator with published benchmark scores and no infrastructure of your own to maintain.

HokAI guides covering Fugu

More AI Agents on HokAI

Visit Fugu Official Site