by ByteDance
The editing-focused Seedream of 2026, sold beside the cheaper Lite and the newer 5.5.
Seedream 5.0 Pro, released 8 July 2026, scores 1129 Elo for image editing on Artificial Analysis from 13,899 votes. It suits designers who need editable layers and region edits, and it replaces Seedream 5.0 Lite where editing control matters more than price.
Checked 11 Nov against ByteDance's own pages.
Priced per generated image on the BytePlus ModelArk list: two resolution tiers for ordinary generation, a cheaper pair of tiers for layer decomposition, and a small fee for every input image after the first.
Seedream 5.0 Pro is ByteDance Seed's image creation model, launched on 8 July 2026, that renders infographics and edits images from point, lasso and sketch signals. It can split a poster into more than ten transparent layers. It is sold through BytePlus ModelArk and the Dola app as a proprietary model.
Reads
Writes
Interactive precision editing
Aims edits with point, lasso and sketch signals, and swaps colours, materials and image blends at pixel level.
Layer separation
Splits a poster into more than ten independent layers, with transparency kept and the hidden background restored.
Complex information visualization
Lays out timelines, bar charts, pie charts and photos in one frame from a single prompt, according to the launch post.
Multilingual text
Renders text in over ten commonly used languages, according to ByteDance.
Realistic lighting and skin
Reproduces light, materials and skin texture, balancing CG expressiveness with photographic quality, in ByteDance's words.
Artificial Analysis image editing Elo, from 13,899 votes
Source: Artificial Analysis image editing leaderboard, read 11 November 2026| Model | Lab | Context | In / out per 1M | Reads and writes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ByteDance | -- | -- | text, image → image | |
| ByteDance | -- | -- | text, image → image | |
| OpenAI | -- | $8 / $30 | text, image → image | |
| Recraft | -- | -- | text, image → image |
| Name | Endpoint | Auth |
|---|---|---|
| BytePlus ModelArk API (model ID dola-seedream-5-0-pro-260628) | https://docs.byteplus.com/en/docs/ModelArk/1541523 | BytePlus API key |
Layer outputs bill by resolution tier
BytePlus bills each layer in a layer-decomposition request by its own generated size, so layers can land in different price tiers.
Workaround: Check the output size of each layer before a bulk run and keep layers at or below 2.61 million pixels to stay on the lower rate.
dola-seedream-5-0-pro-260628 · 08 Jul 2026
Launch of Seedream 5.0 Pro: infographics, interactive editing, layer separation.
seedream-5-0-lite-260128 · 13 Feb 2026
Predecessor tier: Seedream 5.0 Lite.
BytePlus lists $0.045 per generated image up to 2.61 million pixels and $0.09 above that, and layer decomposition costs $0.0225 and $0.045 for the same two tiers. The first input image is free and each further one costs $0.003. Artificial Analysis measures about $90 per 1,000 images on its own prompts, which is higher than the list price.
No. It is proprietary, and the BytePlus list shows no free allowance beyond the first input image. ByteDance also offers it in its Dola chat app, but its pages do not state plan limits there.
It separates an image into independent layers from a text description, and the example poster in the launch post comes apart into over ten layers whose transparency is kept. BytePlus bills each layer by its own output size, so a request can mix price tiers.
On Artificial Analysis, read 11 November 2026, 5.0 Pro scores 1102 Elo for text-to-image and 1129 for editing, while 5.5 scores 1135 and 1159. The newer model leads on both boards, but BytePlus still lists only 5.0 Pro with a per-image price.
ByteDance says it supports input and high-quality text rendering in over ten commonly used languages but does not list them. Check a test prompt in your language before committing to a campaign.
Seedream 5.0 Pro is a multimodal image creation model from ByteDance, launched by its Seed team on 8 July 2026 and followed on 9 November 2026 by Seedream 5.5. It sits above Seedream 5.0 Lite in the lineup and is sold through BytePlus ModelArk under the model ID dola-seedream-5-0-pro-260628, with a chat route through Dola.
The launch post names four headline abilities. It turns dense text and data into laid-out infographics in one pass, and it edits with point selection, lasso selection, sketch rendering, colour and material replacement, layer separation and multi-image fusion. It also reproduces real lighting and skin texture, and it handles prompts and printed text in more than ten widely used languages.
Layer separation is the feature with no close equivalent among its siblings: ByteDance shows a poster split into more than ten independent layers, with the background behind the main subject filled back in, and each layer keeps its transparency so a designer can move or scale it.
Artificial Analysis's independent boards, checked on 11 November 2026, give it 1102 Elo for text-to-image from 12,137 votes and 1129 for image editing from 13,899 votes. On the same text-to-image board GPT Image 2.6 at its max setting scores 1261, so this is not the top-ranked image model.
It is the wrong pick if you want the best raw ranking or the newest weights: ByteDance's own post says fine-grained text rendering and pixel-level editing consistency still have room to improve, and Seedream 5.5 scores 1135 on the text-to-image board. Browse peers in the image models list or the ByteDance models list.
What Hokai read on 11 November 2026: the Seed launch post is dated 8 July 2026, BytePlus's price table lists dola-seedream-5-0-pro-260628 with two output tiers, and both Artificial Analysis boards show its Elo score with the vote count behind it.
Verdict: pick Seedream 5.0 Pro if you need layer separation or region-aimed editing at a published per-image price. Pick Seedream 5.5 or GPT Image 2.6 if raw ranking matters most.
Specifications on this page (context window, token prices, benchmark scores, licence) are read from ByteDance's own model card and documentation. The verdict is Hokai's reading of them, not the provider's claim.