AI App Builders That Actually Publish Their Prices (2026)

Fenado AI's own pricing docs, checked on 14 September 2026, list exactly two paid tiers: Business Plus at $1,999 a month and Business Express at $9,999. There is no $199 tier anywhere on the page.

A build case study from Savi, the agency that implemented Fenado's billing, describes three tiers instead, starting at $199 a month. Half a dozen third-party trackers still advertise that same $199 plan as current. Someone changed the floor and never told the directories, or the agency that wired up the billing.

Why a Ten-Times Price Gap Matters More Than It Looks

A founder comparing "best AI app builder" roundups will see the old $199 figure next to Softr's $19 and Mixo's $9, assume all three sit in the same bracket, and only learn the real number after building a prototype they can't ship without a far bigger bill. Fenado's own product description confirms the trap: the free trial covers prototyping, but production deployment needs a paid plan, and that plan now starts above $1,799 a month even annually.

For a two-person team validating an idea, that is not a rounding error. It is the difference between trying five tools and trying one. A $199 monthly budget covers a real pilot across several vendors; a $1,999 floor consumes the whole quarter's software spend on a single unproven bet.

How to Tell If a Builder's Price Is Real

Before comparing numbers, check whether the number is real. Five questions do most of the work.

Does a price appear before you create an account? Softr, Mixo, WeWeb and Chattee all show tiers on a public page. Playabl, and as of this month the cheapest Fenado tier, do not.

Is the free tier for building or for shipping? A plan that lets you drag components around but blocks a live domain or production data is a demo, not a starter tier. Fenado is the clearest example on this list.

Is the price flat or metered by credits? A flat monthly fee is predictable. Roughly two-thirds of AI-native builders tracked in one 2026 pricing index charge a base fee plus a metered pool of usage. A busy month can cost two to five times the advertised price once every prompt draws the pool down.

That same index puts entry paid tiers for popular AI coding tools like v0 around $10 a month and Replit around $25, both credit-metered. It makes the flat, published tiers on this list the exception in the wider AI-builder market rather than the norm.

What happens above the top published tier? One vendor's top self-serve plan tops out at a stated user cap. Another publishes a starting price and then stops, moving straight to a custom quote for anything larger.

Does exporting your own code cost extra? Some builders hand you a standard application you own outright, portable to any host. Others keep your app running only on their own servers, which is a way of selling you the platform rather than the software.

The Quick-Pick Table

If you need... · Pick · Published price · The one caveat

The cheapest fully public tier · Mixo · $9-$39/mo · Websites and lead forms only, not app logic

A client-facing tool you can hand off · Chattee · up to $99/mo · Web output only, no app-store listing

A real backend behind a custom frontend · WeWeb · raised Feb 2026, no new figure in its changelog · Needs a separate backend service

Data already in a spreadsheet turned into software · Softr · $19-$329/mo · Internal-user seats capped at 100 on the top plan

To try before deciding, no card required · Google Stitch · free during its Labs phase · Frontend only, no backend or auth

Governed, native-mobile enterprise deployment · OutSystems · from $36,300/yr · Everything past the base plan is a quote

The Builders That Show You the Number First

Softr puts three self-serve tiers on its own comparison page: Basic at $19 a month, Pro at $99, and Business at $329. Each is gated by how many people can use the resulting app rather than by locking away features.

The company's own pricing announcement describes that gate as internal users, the people building and managing the app, versus external users, the people using it. Basic allows 10 internal and 1,000 external users; Business allows 100 internal and 10,000 external. The platform converts data already sitting in a spreadsheet into a client portal or internal tool.

Mixo is the cheapest name here with a public number attached. Third-party trackers converge on a $9, $19, $39 ladder, matching what the company has told HokAI directly. It only builds marketing sites and lead-capture forms from a text description, not full application logic, so the low price buys a narrower job.

Chattee, based in Germany, publishes tiers up to $99 a month and leans on that as part of its pitch to agencies: hosting under EU data rules, exportable source code with no proprietary runtime, and white-label branding so a freelancer can build under a client's own name.

WeWeb told customers in a changelog post that its rates "hasn't fully kept up" with the product since they were set in 2021, and raised them on 12 February 2026, letting anyone who switched to annual billing first lock in the old rate for another year. The same announcement does not print the resulting numbers, a small gap even from a vendor that otherwise discloses more than most on this list.

Free For Now: Google Stitch and the Clock No One's Watching

Google Stitch is not hiding a price. It does not have one yet. The interface-design tool, relaunched in 2025 from an earlier acquisition, remains free inside Google's Labs program, with 350 standard and roughly 200 experimental generations available each month and no card required to sign in.

That is a real advantage for someone sketching screens before committing to a stack, and it is also a countdown. There is no announced date for when the free period ends or what it will cost afterward. Trackers guess at a late-2026 exit priced under Figma, but that is speculation from outside the company, not a confirmed plan, and this guide treats it that way.

The Ones That Don't Show You Anything

Fenado's docs page today shows Business Plus at $1,999 a month, or $1,799 on an annual plan, and Business Express at $9,999, or $8,999 annually. Neither figure resembles the $199 plan several trackers, and the billing agency's own case study, still describe.

Fenado was founded in 2024 by Azhar Iqubal and Manish Singh Bisht, who previously built Inshorts, a news app that raised $170 million before they left to start this company. Fenado itself raised $2 million in seed funding, so it has the kind of backing that supports a genuine repricing rather than a typo. What it has not done is tell the sites, or the agency, still quoting the old number.

That $199 figure is not a rumor pulled from thin air. It came from the firm that built the billing system in the first place. Whether the tier was discontinued for new signups, still honored for early customers, or simply left un-updated in a payment product name, this guide could not confirm from the outside, and says so rather than guessing.

Playabl has a simpler problem. Its homepage, checked the same day as every other figure in this guide, carries no pricing link, no plan names, and no mention of credits anywhere. HokAI's own record on the product notes a paid tier launched alongside metered usage earlier in 2026, but nothing on the live site confirms that today. A builder cannot learn what "paid" costs here without creating an account first, and this guide will not guess at a number the product itself won't state.

The silence is notable because the product is not a side project nobody uses. It is backed by Y Combinator and has an active player base large enough that a pricing decision genuinely matters to real customers, not just to the two founders. Choosing not to publish a number at that scale is a choice, not an oversight from a team too small to write a pricing page.

What Enterprise Pricing Actually Buys

OutSystems belongs on a different shelf from the rest of this list, and putting it on the same shelf is the point. Its Developer Cloud plan starts at $36,300 a year, covering three runtimes and 100 internal users, enough for one medium production application. Community-reported pricing for additional capacity packs runs $15,000 to $18,000 per 150 application objects, though the company does not publish an official per-pack rate, and anything past the first application becomes a negotiated quote.

Nine consecutive years on a leading analyst's low-code leaderboard buys the right to skip a self-serve pricing page. A team comparing this platform against a consumer-grade builder on a spreadsheet is comparing two different purchases: one is software, the other a governed platform with native mobile output and a sales process attached. The $36,300 floor is real and published, which already puts it ahead of Fenado's current disclosure, even though it costs roughly a hundred times Softr's entry tier.

Softr vs Fenado: Same Buyer, Opposite Instinct

Both vendors chase the same customer: a non-technical founder who wants working software connected to real data, fast. Softr answers with three numbers on one page and a builder-seat cap you can plan around before you commit.

The other answers with a demo, a sales conversation, and, this month, a price several times higher than its own marketing history implies. Neither approach is dishonest in a legal sense. The current tiers are posted, just not where the older listings, and the billing agency's own write-up, still point. A buyer choosing on price alone would need to visit the vendor's own docs page directly rather than trust the comparison sites this guide had to cross-check to catch the gap.

Who Should Skip This Comparison Entirely

Under a $500 monthly budget for the whole tool, skip the enterprise option outright, and skip any vendor whose live tier starts in four figures once you actually need to ship. That rules out OutSystems for almost every self-funded team, and it rules out Fenado the moment a prototype needs to go live rather than stay in demo mode.

Needing a listing in an app store rather than a web page rules out every other name here except OutSystems, whose price reflects that capability. Already having an engineer who can wire up a backend favors WeWeb's frontend-only split over an all-in-one tool that bundles its own database. And not yet knowing what kind of tool the job calls for makes comparing prices premature; HokAI's Smart Match can narrow the category first, before a single figure matters.

The Case for Sales-Led Pricing

There is a fair defense buried in all of this: a platform selling governed enterprise deployment genuinely varies by seat count, integration depth and support tier, so a single sticker number would mislead more than it informs. That defense is real, which is why OutSystems earns no criticism here for quoting past its published base plan. A $36,300 floor with a custom number above it is not the same failure as no number at all.

It does not extend to a subscription sold to a small team, which is the exact product category where a flat, printed number is the norm and where two names on this list currently make a buyer ask before they will say. A design tool's free period will not last forever either, and when it ends, that moment becomes the next test of which instinct wins here.

Frequently asked questions

Which AI app builders publish their pricing without requiring a signup?

Softr, Mixo, Chattee and WeWeb all list tiers on a public pricing page. Softr runs $19 to $329 a month depending on user count, Mixo runs $9 to $39, and Chattee tops out at $99. WeWeb raised its rates in February 2026 but does not print the new numbers in its own changelog post, so check its pricing page directly for the current figure.

Why does Fenado AI's pricing look different on different sites?

Fenado's own docs page currently lists two tiers, Business Plus at $1,999 a month and Business Express at $9,999. A build case study from Savi, the agency that implemented Fenado's billing, describes a third tier at $199 a month that several tracker sites still list as current. Fenado has not published anything explaining the gap.

Does Google Stitch cost anything?

No. Google Stitch remains free inside Google Labs, with 350 standard and 200 experimental design generations a month and no credit card required. Google has not announced when it will leave Labs or what it will cost afterward; predictions of a late-2026 paid tier are analyst speculation, not a confirmed roadmap.

How much does OutSystems cost compared to consumer app builders?

OutSystems' Developer Cloud plan starts at $36,300 a year for three runtimes and 100 internal users, roughly a hundred times Softr's entry tier. Anything past the first production application moves to a custom quote, which is standard for enterprise low-code platforms selling governed, native-mobile-capable deployment rather than a self-serve tool.

Is a metered, credit-based AI app builder more expensive than a flat-rate one?

It can be. Roughly two-thirds of AI-native builders tracked in industry pricing surveys charge a base fee plus usage credits, and a heavy month can run two to five times the advertised price. Softr, Mixo, Chattee and WeWeb's self-serve tiers are flat instead, so the sticker price is close to the real price.

Covered in this guide

• Softr: Build business software with AI, no code required
• Fenado: Fenado AI is a chat-driven no-code builder that generates native iOS, Android, and web apps, built by former Inshorts leadership with $2M in seed funding.
• Chattee: AI app builder that turns plain-English prompts into a working full-stack web app, generating the frontend, backend, database, and login system automatically.
• Google Stitch: Google Labs' free AI tool that turns prompts, sketches, or voice into 5 linked UI screens, exporting to Figma or code.
• Mixo: Launch a lead-generating website in 60 seconds with AI
• OutSystems: Enterprise low-code platform with 200+ integrations and AI agents. Gartner Magic Quadrant Leader 9 years running, used by 1,500+ enterprises. Ships apps 75% faster than custom code. Custom enterprise pricing.
• Playabl: AI game builder from a Y Combinator Spring 2026 team, now out of beta with a paid Pro tier, a two-games-a-day free cap and ad revenue share for creators.
• WeWeb: No-code Vue.js frontend builder used by 60,000+ monthly users. AI generates a working app from a single prompt in minutes, with full code export and direct backend connections.

Sources