Side-by-side pricing, features and compliance for any tools in the directory.
Side-by-side comparison of Claude Code, Devin: pricing, capabilities, integrations and compliance — from verified HokAI records.
Anthropic
Pick it if: Senior software engineers at Series A-C startups with large codebases and no dedicated QA team
Its edge: Dynamic Workflows spawning up to 1,000 parallel subagents for codebase-wide migrations and audits — no competing tool in 2026 operates at this scale within a single session.
The catch: No free tier and opaque usage throttling: the $20 Pro plan runs out mid-week for heavy users, and the jump to Max 5x at $100 feels disproportionate with no intermediate option.
Cognition
Pick it if: Engineering managers with a backlog of well-scoped maintenance tasks
Its edge: Fully autonomous multi-hour task execution in a sandboxed VM with its own shell, editor, and browser, capable of migrating legacy codebases like COBOL and Fortran to Rust or Go with minimal human oversight.
The catch: ACU-based usage billing makes monthly costs unpredictable, often pushing real spend to $300-500/month even on the $20 entry plan, and Devin still struggles with ambiguous requirements and architectural decisions.
| Entry price | From $20/mo (up to $200/mo) | Free to start |
|---|---|---|
| Free tier | false | true |
| Paid tiers | Pro — $20/mo; Max 5x — $100/mo; Max 20x — $200/mo | Free — $0/mo; Pro — $20/mo; Max — $200/mo |
| Hidden costs | API token overages if using Claude Code programmatically or in CI/CD pipelines outside the subscription budget; Teams Premium requires a minimum of 5 seats at $125/seat/month, making the floor $625/month for the smallest eligible team; Dyna | Agent Compute Units bill separately from the monthly subscription at $2.00-2.25 each, and a single multi-hour task can consume 10 or more ACUs; Enterprise VPC deployment, SSO, and dedicated support require a custom contract beyond the $500/ |
| Budget fit | mid | mid |
| Killer feature | Dynamic Workflows spawning up to 1,000 parallel subagents for codebase-wide migrations and audits — no competing tool in 2026 operates at this scale within a single session. | Fully autonomous multi-hour task execution in a sandboxed VM with its own shell, editor, and browser, capable of migrating legacy codebases like COBOL and Fortran to Rust or Go with minimal human oversight. |
|---|---|---|
| Primary weakness | No free tier and opaque usage throttling: the $20 Pro plan runs out mid-week for heavy users, and the jump to Max 5x at $100 feels disproportionate with no intermediate option. | ACU-based usage billing makes monthly costs unpredictable, often pushing real spend to $300-500/month even on the $20 entry plan, and Devin still struggles with ambiguous requirements and architectural decisions. |
| Best for | Senior software engineers at Series A-C startups with large codebases and no dedicated QA team; Platform engineers managing monorepos who need automated refactoring at scale | Engineering managers with a backlog of well-scoped maintenance tasks; Platform teams running legacy code migrations |
| Worst for | Junior developers still learning syntax who need explanations, not autonomous execution; Freelancers billing hourly who cannot absorb $100-200/month tool cost on variable income | Solo indie developers on tight budgets; Teams needing fast interactive pair-programming for ambiguous feature work |
| Minimum skill level | intermediate | intermediate |
| Defensibility | 9 | 7 |
| Target audience | Senior software engineers doing large-scale refactoring across multiple files and services, Full-stack developers building features where changes span frontend, backend, and database layers, DevOps and platform engineers integrating AI-assi | Engineering managers triaging a backlog of well-scoped bug fixes and small features, Platform teams running legacy codebase migrations from COBOL, Fortran, or Objective-C to modern stacks, DevOps teams needing automated environment setup, d |
| HokAI rating | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Key features | Highest Published SWE-bench Score (Opus 4.8); 1 Million Token Context Window; Dynamic Workflows with Up to 1,000 Subagents | Autonomous end-to-end task delivery; Sandboxed VM environment; Legacy code migration |
|---|---|---|
| Capabilities | Vision; Function calling; Long context | Vision; Function calling; Long context |
| Strengths | The top-tier model's benchmark lead over rival coding agents shows up in practice as fewer failed autonomous attempts on complex refactors, according to early Max-tier users comparing it with Cursor and GitHub Copilot.; Holding an entire la | Resolved 13.86% of real GitHub issues end-to-end at launch, about 7x the prior best of 1.96%, and Nubank reports a roughly 12x engineering-hours improvement on migration work using Devin.; Entry pricing dropped 96% from $500/month to $20/mo |
| Watch out for | No free tier and no trial with full agentic functionality: the cheapest plan still costs a real subscription, and the jump to the next tier up feels steep for anyone who outgrows the entry plan mid-week.; Model lock-in: only Anthropic's Cla | An independent test found Devin completed only 3 of 20 assigned tasks, well short of the 'fully autonomous' framing used in marketing.; Usage is billed in Agent Compute Units at $2.00-2.25 each (about 15 minutes of work per ACU), so real mo |
| Underlying model | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | — |
| Context window | 1M | — |
| MCP support | true | — |
| Multimodal | text; vision | — |
Compare up to four at a time, or run Smart Match to get a ranked shortlist. Browse the full AI directory.