Claude Sonnet 5 vs Mistral Large 3

Side-by-side comparison of Claude Sonnet 5, Mistral Large 3: pricing, capabilities, integrations and compliance — from verified HokAI records.

Claude Sonnet 5

Anthropic

Pick it if: Claude Sonnet 5 is Anthropic's mid-tier flagship (released June 30, 2026) with a 1M-token context window and 82.1% SWE-bench Verified, the first model to clear 80% on that benchmark. Priced at $3 input / $15 output per 1M tokens (40% below Opus 4.8), it defaults to adaptive thinking and posts 96.2% on GPQA Diamond and 81.2% on OSWorld-Verified computer use.

Its edge: First model to break 80% on SWE-bench Verified at 82.1%, ahead of Gemini 3.1 Pro (80.6%) and GPT-5.4 (~80%).

The catch: No native audio or video input/output; text and image only, requiring a separate ASR/TTS stack for voice apps.

Mistral Large 3

Mistral AI

Pick it if: Mistral Large 3 suits teams that want a self-hostable, openly licensed alternative to closed frontier models for coding and long-document work, scoring about 92% on HumanEval. It's the wrong pick for graduate-level science reasoning, where newer open-weight reasoning models pull well ahead, and for teams lacking the multi-GPU infrastructure needed to self-host it at scale.

Its edge: Apache 2.0 open weights at frontier scale (675B total, 41B active MoE), with no commercial-use restrictions.

The catch: GPQA Diamond score of 43.9% trails DeepSeek-V3.2 and Kimi K2-Thinking, which score 70-85% on the same benchmark.

Pricing

Input / 1M tokens$3$0.5
Output / 1M tokens$15$1.50
Cached input / 1M$0.3
Blended cost (3:1)$6$0.75
Free tiertruefalse
Pricing modelper-tokenper-token

Verdict & fit

StrengthsFirst model to break 80% on SWE-bench Verified at 82.1%, ahead of Gemini 3.1 Pro (80.6%) and GPT-5.4 (~80%).; Computer use jumped to 81.2% on OSWorld-Verified and 80.4% on Terminal-Bench 2.1, up from 78.5% and 67.0% on Sonnet 4.6.; Priced aApache 2.0 open weights at frontier scale (675B total, 41B active MoE), with no commercial-use restrictions.; 256K-token context window for both input and output, double Mistral Medium 3's 128K.; Strong coding performance (~92% HumanEval pa
LimitationsNo native audio or video input/output; text and image only, requiring a separate ASR/TTS stack for voice apps.; New tokenizer produces roughly 30% more tokens for the same text than Sonnet 4.6, inflating raw token counts and requiring max_tGPQA Diamond score of 43.9% trails DeepSeek-V3.2 and Kimi K2-Thinking, which score 70-85% on the same benchmark.; Self-hosting requires holding all 675B parameters in VRAM (roughly 355GB at 4-bit, ~710GB at FP16) even though only 41B are ac

Capability envelope

Context window1M256K
Max output tokens128K256K
Input modalitiestext; image; pdftext; image
Output modalitiestext; tool-callstext
CapabilitiesVision; Tool use; Web browsingVision; Tool use; Function calling
Reasoning modesadaptive-thinkingstandard
Long-context recallhighhigh
Opennessproprietaryopen-source

Compare up to four at a time, or run Smart Match to get a ranked shortlist. Browse the full AI directory.