Side-by-side pricing, features and compliance for any tools in the directory.
Side-by-side comparison of Make, n8n: pricing, capabilities, integrations and compliance — from verified HokAI records.
Make (part of Celonis)
Pick it if: Operations Manager optimizing multi-step business processes
Its edge: Advanced visual scenario builder with complex branching, conditional logic, and data manipulation that handles enterprise-grade workflows Zapier cannot match
The catch: Steeper learning curve and credit-based pricing model requiring careful monitoring; smaller integration ecosystem than Zapier (2,400 vs 5,000+ apps)
n8n GmbH
Pick it if: Platform/DevOps Engineers
Its edge: Execution-based billing model combined with code flexibility—allows building infinitely complex workflows at 40-90% lower cost than task-based competitors like Zapier/Make
The catch: Steep learning curve for non-technical users; requires API knowledge and DevOps skills for self-hosting; limited support on lower tiers relies on community forums
| Entry price | Free to start | Free to start |
|---|---|---|
| Free tier | true | true |
| Paid tiers | Free — $0/mo; Pro — $9/mo; Business — $0/mo | Community Edition — $0/mo; Starter (Cloud) — $20/mo; Pro (Cloud) — $50/mo |
| Hidden costs | Operations overage fees beyond plan limits can accumulate quickly on large-scale automations; Requires understanding of credit consumption model which varies by operation complexity; Legacy system integration may require custom webhooks or | Self-hosting infrastructure costs ($5-40/month for basic VPS, scaling to hundreds for production); DevOps resource investment for maintenance, patching, scaling, and database management; Business plan execution fees can escalate quickly for |
| Budget fit | mid | mid |
| Killer feature | Advanced visual scenario builder with complex branching, conditional logic, and data manipulation that handles enterprise-grade workflows Zapier cannot match | Execution-based billing model combined with code flexibility—allows building infinitely complex workflows at 40-90% lower cost than task-based competitors like Zapier/Make |
|---|---|---|
| Primary weakness | Steeper learning curve and credit-based pricing model requiring careful monitoring; smaller integration ecosystem than Zapier (2,400 vs 5,000+ apps) | Steep learning curve for non-technical users; requires API knowledge and DevOps skills for self-hosting; limited support on lower tiers relies on community forums |
| Best for | Operations Manager optimizing multi-step business processes; Systems Administrator managing cross-app data flows; Integration Engineer building sophisticated automation architectures | Platform/DevOps Engineers; IT Operations Directors; Solutions Architects |
| Worst for | Complete beginner wanting instant results with no learning curve; Budget-constrained startup with very limited operation volume; Legacy enterprise heavily dependent on on-premise systems | Non-technical marketing teams; Business analysts without API knowledge; End users needing instant deployment |
| Minimum skill level | intermediate | intermediate |
| Defensibility | 7 Strong visual builder UI and advanced branching capabilities create switching costs; acquired by $13B Celonis gives financial backing; 400k+ user base with established integrations; however, open competition from Zapier (larger), n8n (open-source), and Power Automate (Microsoft ecosystem) limits defensibility | 8 Strong moat built on fair-code license (open-source but protected from commercial abuse), massive community (200k+ members, 179.4k GitHub stars), extensive integration ecosystem (400+), and architectural superiority over competitors for complex workflows. AI-first positioning with 75% of customers using AI gives first-mover advantage in AI orchestration space. However, moat weakened by competitors (Zapier, Make, Workato) having stronger compliance certifications and larger enterprise adoption. |
| Target audience | Operations Manager, Business Analyst, Systems Administrator, Automation Engineer, Integration Developer, Product Manager, Startup Founder | Technical Founders & DevOps Engineers, IT Operations Teams (IT Ops, Sec Ops), Software Developers, Enterprise Architects, Data Engineers, Compliance Officers (regulated industries), Operations Managers, Systems Integrators |
| Key features | Visual Scenario Builder; Advanced Data Handling; AI Agent Integration | Hybrid Visual + Code Builder; 500+ Pre-Built Integrations; AI-Native Architecture with MCP Support |
|---|---|---|
| Capabilities | Vision; Function calling | Vision; Function calling |
| Strengths | Handles multi-step, branching automations that trigger-only tools can't build, which is the main reason teams outgrow Zapier or IFTTT for Make; Visual scenario builder makes even intricate automations easier to understand, map, and troubles | The hybrid visual-plus-code approach means workflows are not capped by whatever the built-in nodes happen to support, a real advantage over strictly no-code tools.; Complete data control with self-hosting on your own infrastructure; the Com |
| Watch out for | Steeper learning curve than simpler tools like Zapier, especially for complex scenarios and advanced features; Understanding and monitoring credit consumption can be complex and require careful cost management; Better suited for modern clou | Steeper learning curve than pure no-code tools like Zapier: requires familiarity with APIs and basic programming concepts.; Self-hosting requires real DevOps expertise for server setup, maintenance, database administration, and scaling.; Li |
Compare up to four at a time, or run Smart Match to get a ranked shortlist. Browse the full AI directory.