Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B-A12B review, pricing and limits

NVIDIA's vision-language member of the Nemotron 3.5 line, built for agents that read pages and screens and then call tools, at roughly one-fifth the parameters of NVIDIA's largest reasoning model.

  • ga
  • open source
  • multimodal
  • Nemotron 3.5 family

NVIDIA released Nemotron 3.5 Super VL on October 15, 2026, with context of up to 1M tokens and a median output speed of 436.2 tokens per second across hosts, as measured by Artificial Analysis. It suits teams that want one open model for document, screenshot and tool-calling agents instead of running a separate text model and vision model.

What changed

  • · New feature Available on OpenRouter, ModelScope and as NVIDIA NIM at launch (v1.0) source
  • · New feature LiLiCorr speculative drafter for DGX Spark (v1.0) source
  • · Release Nemotron 3.5 Super VL released with BF16 and NVFP4 weights (v1.0) source

All changes across HokAI this week

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is NVIDIA's open vision-language model, scoring 89.52 on GPQA Diamond in NVIDIA's full-precision evaluation. A mixture-of-experts design with 120B total and 12B active parameters, it reads text, images and video, then reasons and calls tools from one checkpoint released under the OpenMDW-1.1 license.

Where it sits

  • $0.175/M$ per 1M tokensBlended price (3:1)Lower is better#10 / 87peer median $1.69/Mvendor price, checked by HokAI
  • 436 tok/stokens/sOutput speedHigher is better#3 / 53peer median 94 tok/scited: Artificial Analysis
  • 71.1%% solvedSWE-bench VerifiedHigher is better#25 / 37peer median 76.5%per source, see benchmark scores
  • 89.5%% correctGPQA DiamondHigher is better#23 / 59peer median 87.4%per source, see benchmark scores

Cheaper than 87% of the 87 GA models with a published price, and in the bottom third on SWE-bench Verified (rank 25 of 37).

Ranks are against GA models on HokAI that publish the same figure; ties share a rank.

Provider: NVIDIA · Family: Nemotron 3.5

More about NVIDIA on HokAI

Context window: 1,000,000 tokens · Max output: 262,144

Input modalities: text, image, video · Output: text, tool-calls

About Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B-A12B

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is an open vision-language model from NVIDIA, released on October 15, 2026 alongside the edge model Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B. It is a mixture-of-experts (MoE) network that interleaves Mamba-2 state-space layers, MoE layers with 512 routed experts each, and attention layers, with a C-RADIO vision encoder and a connector that feed images and video frames into the language backbone. The backbone starts from Nemotron 3 Super Base, a lineage that includes the text-only 120B-A12B Nemotron 3 Super NVIDIA shipped on March 11, 2026, and was then distilled from Nemotron 3 Ultra. NVIDIA says training used about 26 trillion tokens, followed by roughly 3.8 million post-training samples and reinforcement learning across dozens of environments. It sits beside Nemotron 3.5 Lightning, the text-only high-volume model, as the multimodal tier of the NVIDIA model line for agents that must read pages as well as call tools.

On NVIDIA's BF16 model card the model scores 89.52 on GPQA Diamond, 71.10 on SWE-bench Verified, 51.78 on SWE-bench Pro, 60.67 on Terminal-Bench 2.1, 88.22 on LiveCodeBench v6, 70.86 on IFBench, 51.14 on OSWorld-Verified and 31.79 on text-only Humanity's Last Exam. The NVFP4 checkpoint stays close on most rows (89.90 on GPQA Diamond) with a larger drop on MMLU-ProX, 73.76 against 76.91. NVIDIA also reports 63.44 percent on Hermes Bench and 87.05 percent on LangChain agent evals, both ahead of the much larger Nemotron 3 Ultra. Every one of those figures is vendor-reported. The card sets the model against Qwen3.8-Flash-Next, GLM-5.3-Flash and DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731, and on the headline coding and knowledge rows at least one of them scores higher. Artificial Analysis, an independent evaluator, gives the model 26 on its Intelligence Index v4.3.2 and a median time to first token of 0.82 seconds, and counts 170M output tokens to run the index.

NVIDIA specifies up to 1M tokens of context, shared by the prompt, images, conversation history, tool results and the reply, and notes that individual deployment recipes may use less to fit GPU memory. OpenRouter lists a 1,048,576-token window and up to 262,144 completion tokens. Long-context results, which matter against the other models with 400K or more context, are uneven: 89.71 on GraphWalks, above every peer in NVIDIA's table, but 68.62 on AA-LCR, below the 75.1 to 79.7 that those peers post.

Inputs are text, images and mp4 video up to two minutes (compare other video-input models), with documents supplied as page images plus text; output is text. Hosts such as OpenRouter expose function calling and JSON-schema structured output, and reasoning can be switched off, set to medium or left fully on through the chat template. On vision rows NVIDIA reports 80.82 on CharXiv reasoning, 85.60 on V*, 78.16 on MathVision and 62.82 on MMLongBench-Doc, and its technical blog calls the model one of the top open entries on the OCRBench v2 leaderboard. Video is the thin spot at 32.85 on Video-MME v2, and not every serving recipe accepts it: NVIDIA's NVFP4 recipes for DGX Spark and for SGLang list text and image only.

Weights ship as BF16 and NVFP4 checkpoints on Hugging Face. BF16 needs four H100s or two GB200s. The 4-bit NVFP4 checkpoint fits a DGX Spark, an H200, a pair of H100s or a GB200 under vLLM or SGLang, with TensorRT-LLM listed for the GB200. Community GGUF builds from Unsloth span 46.1GB at 1-bit to 132GB at 8-bit, and llama.cpp runs them. Hosted access comes from NVIDIA's free trial endpoint on build.nvidia.com, from providers on OpenRouter such as Together AI, and from Baseten; the pricing notes carry the rates. NVIDIA NIM packages the model as a container that NVIDIA says is refreshed every two weeks.

NVIDIA filtered training data with a Gemma-3 4B-based guard model trained on its Nemotron Content Safety Dataset v2, mitigates bias with supervised fine-tuning and RLHF, and measures it with the BBQ benchmark; its bias card says testing was limited to English and multilingual parity is not claimed. The model cards name no red-team partners and cite no responsible scaling policy. Foundation data was collected from 2013 to December 2025 across English, 19 other spoken languages and 43 programming languages, post-training focused on French, German, Italian, Japanese, Spanish and Chinese, and 10B tokens of Indic continued pre-training target Indian languages. The license, which puts it in the open-source group, grants use without restriction and places no limits on outputs, and NVIDIA published an EU public summary of the training content.

The model fits agents that read documents, charts and screenshots and then act. NVIDIA names claims review, receipt extraction, enterprise search and security triage as targets, and cites Scale AI, Ramp, AI21 Labs and Perplexity among organizations customizing or integrating it. It is a poor first pick for terminal-driven coding agents or browsing research, where Qwen3.8-Flash-Next and GLM-5.3-Flash post higher scores in NVIDIA's own table, and for plain-text pipelines, where Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is the smaller NVIDIA option. Version 1.0 is the only release so far, and the launch post's only roadmap item is a Bolt E4B edge model due October 23.

Pricing

NVIDIA sets no list price because the weights are open, so each host prices the model itself. Rates read on 20 October 2026: on OpenRouter the lowest was Crusoe at $0.10 input, $0.40 output and $0.08 cached input per 1M tokens, Together AI, DeepInfra and CoreWeave charged $0.15 and $0.50 with cached reads at $0.02, and Venice charged $0.25 and $1.25. [Baseten](/hub/services/baseten) lists $0.20 input, $0.04 cached and $0.50 output on its Model API. Artificial Analysis shows medians of $0.225 and $0.575 across providers. NVIDIA's free endpoint on build.nvidia.com is meant for prototyping. Self-hosting swaps token fees for GPU rental time; Unsloth's guidance for its smallest [llama.cpp](/hub/tools/llama-cpp) build is at least 64GB of RAM or unified memory.

What a real job costs

JobInputOutputTotal
Summarise a 20-page PDF$0.0030$0.0004$0.0034
Support reply$0.0002$0.0001$0.0003
One coding agent run$0.020$0.0080$0.028

Budgets: 20-page PDF = 30k in / 1k out · Support reply = 2k in / 300 out · Coding agent run = 200k in / 20k out. Computed from the vendor's per-token prices at render time; cached-input discounts are not applied.

Key Features

  • Hybrid Mamba-2 MoE backbone: Interleaves Mamba-2, mixture-of-experts and attention layers, with 512 routed experts per MoE layer and a shared Multi-Token Prediction head that drafts tokens for built-in speculative decoding.
  • Text, image and video in one model: A C-RADIO vision encoder reads images, document pages and mp4 clips up to two minutes, and the model answers in text.
  • Three reasoning levels: The chat template switches reasoning off, to medium or fully on, so simple turns can skip the thinking tokens that agents otherwise pay for.
  • NVFP4 build for small footprints: The NVFP4 checkpoint, trained with quantization-aware distillation, runs on one DGX Spark, one H200, two H100s or one GB200.
  • Open weights, data and RL environments: Weights, post-training datasets and NeMo Gym environments are open, so teams can adapt it with supervised fine-tuning, LoRA or reinforcement learning.
  • LiLiCorr drafter for DGX Spark: An optional speculative drafter that NVIDIA says generates tokens up to 2.3x faster than decoding without speculation on DGX Spark.

Pros

  • One checkpoint covers documents, screenshots, short video and tool calls, so an agent does not pass context between a text model and a vision model.
  • Several independent hosts already serve it, and the permissive license lets a team move to its own GPUs without renegotiating terms.
  • NVIDIA reports it ahead of the larger Nemotron 3 Ultra on two agent evals, the closest evidence that distillation kept agent skill.
  • Artificial Analysis rates its output speed well above the median for open-weight models of similar size.

Cons

  • Behind Qwen3.8-Flash-Next on every vision row of NVIDIA's table except English OCRBench v2, and well behind it on terminal and browsing tasks.
  • Weak on long banking-style tool dialogs: 18.88 on tau3-bench banking, against 44.5 for Qwen3.8-Flash-Next in the same table.
  • Nearly every score is vendor-reported with NVIDIA's own test settings, and independent results so far come mainly from Artificial Analysis.
  • The 1M-token window depends on the host, and long-document reasoning is the weaker side of its long-context profile.
  • Verbose reasoning: Artificial Analysis counts 170M output tokens to run its index, which raises per-task cost on pay-per-token hosts.

Benchmarks

  • IFBench: 70.9% vendor-reported · 20 Oct 2026 — How precisely the model follows detailed instructions, % passing.
  • GPQA Diamond: 89.5% vendor-reported · 20 Oct 2026 — PhD-level science questions that are hard to search for, % correct.
  • SWE-bench Pro: 51.8% vendor-reported · 20 Oct 2026 — Harder, longer real-repository coding tasks, % solved.
  • LiveCodeBench v6: 88.2% vendor-reported · 20 Oct 2026 — Recently published coding problems, % solved.
  • OSWorld Verified: 51.1% vendor-reported · 20 Oct 2026 — Tasks completed by operating a real desktop, % solved.
  • SWE-bench Verified: 71.1% vendor-reported · 20 Oct 2026 — Real GitHub issues fixed end to end, % solved.
  • Terminal-Bench 2.1: 60.7% vendor-reported · 20 Oct 2026 — Multi-step tasks completed in a real command line, % solved.
  • Humanity's Last Exam: 31.8% vendor-reported · 20 Oct 2026 — Expert-written questions across many fields, % correct.
  • AA Intelligence Index: 26 cited: Artificial Analysis · 20 Oct 2026 — Composite of 10 evaluations run by Artificial Analysis, 0 to 100.
  • AA blended price: $0.14/M cited: Artificial Analysis · 20 Oct 2026 — Price per 1M tokens at a 3:1 input to output blend, as listed by Artificial Analysis.
  • Output speed: 436 tok/s cited: Artificial Analysis · 20 Oct 2026 — Median tokens written per second as measured by Artificial Analysis.

A benchmark is an exam, not the job. Scores transfer unevenly between tasks, so weigh the one closest to your workload and read every figure with its source.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does Nemotron 3.5 Super VL cost to run through an API?

Hosts set the price, and the cheapest is not the best value. In OpenRouter's table on 20 October 2026, Crusoe was lowest at $0.10 input and $0.40 output per 1M tokens but also showed the slowest throughput (91 tokens per second) and the lowest uptime (90.18 percent). DeepInfra at $0.15 and $0.50 showed 388 tokens per second and full uptime in the same table. Self-hosting removes per-token fees but needs the GPUs listed in the specs.

Where does Nemotron 3.5 Super VL fall behind Qwen3.8-Flash-Next?

NVIDIA's own table puts Qwen3.8-Flash-Next ahead on Terminal-Bench 2.1 (85.80 against 60.67), BrowseComp (89.0 against 78), MathVision (87.5 against 78.16) and Video-MME v2 (45.1 against 32.85). Super VL leads on GraphWalks (89.71 against 76.1) and, narrowly, on English OCRBench v2. Both columns are vendor-reported, so a gap of a few points is noise, but a gap of about 25 points on terminal tasks is not.

Can you self-host Nemotron 3.5 Super VL for commercial work?

Yes. NVIDIA calls it ready for commercial or non-commercial use under OpenMDW-1.1, a license that grants use without restriction and puts no limits on outputs, and Artificial Analysis lists it as an open-weights model. The constraint is hardware: the full-precision weights need a multi-GPU server, while the 4-bit checkpoint fits a 128GB DGX Spark.

Does Nemotron 3.5 Super VL keep or train on your prompts?

NVIDIA never sees traffic sent to a copy of the weights that you run yourself. On hosted endpoints the host decides: the notice on NVIDIA's free OpenRouter endpoint says sessions are logged for security and to improve NVIDIA products, without a link to your identity. Read a paid host's retention terms before sending client documents to it.

Which jobs suit Nemotron 3.5 Super VL, and which do not?

It suits agents that read PDFs, charts, receipts or screenshots and then call tools, the pattern NVIDIA cites for claims review and receipt extraction. It is a weaker pick for terminal-driven coding agents and web research, where Qwen3.8-Flash-Next and GLM-5.3-Flash score higher in NVIDIA's table. Text-only pipelines can use the smaller Nemotron 3.5 Lightning, and a 24GB local machine suits Nemotron 3.5 Bolt.

Top Alternatives

  • Qwen3.8-Flash-Next: Pick Qwen3.8-Flash-Next if terminal work, browsing and vision accuracy decide the purchase; pick Super VL if graph-style long-context tasks matter more.
  • GLM-5.3-Flash: Pick GLM-5.3-Flash for repository and terminal coding agents; pick Super VL when the agent operates a desktop or watches video.
  • DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731: Pick DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 for text-only coding and web research; pick Super VL when screenshots, charts or clips are part of the input.
  • Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: Pick Lightning for high-volume text-only agent steps; pick Super VL when the same agent must read images or video.
  • Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B 24GB: Pick Bolt for a local agent inside 24GB of memory; pick Super VL with a DGX Spark class machine or data center GPUs.

More AI Models on HokAI

Visit Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B-A12B Official Page